Skip to main content

I`ve been writing a "book" & had a fun deduction

 So, for fun, I started writing a book. It`s very Sherlock Holmesy. I got my own little twist on it by adding some attributes from The Mentalist. That is because in my three favourite shows there is both BBC Sherlock AND The Mentalist. The third one is The office but the no. 1. I implemented some, but not so much of my attributes. 

It is basically a blog. The personal blog of Timothy Coates. It plays after he went trough a rough break-up and starts to solve crimes (or document them) with his roomate and friend Arthur Cene. I`ve already got some of the first case where a machanic is killed because a client that robbed an ATM left some of major evidence against him in his car, that he gave to the machanic for surveillance. I`ve got he majority of the part before the first case. 


Also I`ve been planning to go outside into the city today because I want to practice some of my methods. Speaking of methods, I think I can read clothes now. The method I basically about checking the most streched points like the hip or the elbow or the shoulders, to determine how used it is, and the shade of the fabric and overall quality to know how old it is.

Also also, I wanted to talk about a fun deduction I made. Basically I was cycling to kayak practice when I noticed two people walking thru the sidewalk. They were a male and female. What I observed: Same height, simillar face structure, not walking close, same primary hand (boy had left hand in pocket, girl had purse in left hand) around 15-16. What I deduced: closely related, probably siblings. Same height and same age, that means twins. It was a passing deduction so maybe I got something wrong or didn`t check  right or didn`t remember right.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Weekly observations week 2 & 3

 I was too lazy to post the week I finished those weeks observations.The next 3 weeks will have body language observations.Anyways here are the last 2 weeks of the observation phase. I will hopefully be able to post some the next week: Children's socks on a girl my age 3 vegetable pencilcases 1 tech fleece guy grey britain hoodie blunt nails on 3 girls clear posture An obese guy that goes to the gym A guy playing with mini BMX A sports Yersey  Bad makeup on a girl exadgerating the eyebrows Lot of people drinking capri sun Cyan hoodie military 4 people doing their homework in the morning frustration clearly displaying  Happy Deducing!  

Hi

 Hello everyone. It's been a ridiculously long time. I honestly miss this sometimes. It's been over a year since I wrote my first entry. And I really miss it.  I'm (hopefully starting a new blog. It's going to be my personal blog filled with rants and notes about projects. Also I'm gonna write essays around various topics. I'm trying to rid myself of any boredom I might have. For the last time... Happy Deducing!

The comparison and analysis of Sherlock Holmes and Patrick Jane

 I've already did an entry on this in the past but it way too shallow. I wasn;t able to relly reflect on the structute of both characters I mentioned. These 2 characters are way different from each other, but have a surprising lot in common. Introducing: Sherlock Holmes Since he appeared out of thin air in the study of scarlet , he has been a pioneer of deduction in pop culture with over 200 actors having portrayed him. When someone asks a normie to name a deductionist They will either ask what deduction is, or say Sherlock Holmes. Holmes is a keen observer of such small details, and a really quick thinker. A lot of videos on youtube on the topic of deduction are titled something like: "How to think like Sherlock Holmes" and not "How to deduce". This is  understandable, because everyone knows Sherlock Holmes, but very few know about deduction except the tax meaning. What I'm trying to say is that Sherlock, the deerhunter hat and the pipe, is deduction in th...