Skip to main content

soo...

 Alright I think i`ve got some explaining to do. I haven`t been writing this because of school and I`m really busy. This does not mean I`m not deducing, I am, but a moderate amount only because I keep forgetting and I`m not meeting any new people and I basically only rely on nonverbals wich I don`t think is too good for my deducing 'techique', wich hasn`t been going so good I basically forgot a lot of things about all the other sources I gather info from and I only rely on body language wich is supposed to be my last resort when it comes to it. 

I read "The dictionary of body language" by Joe Navarro and it was a very fun and useful read for a deductionist like me. I do not know if too much body language is healthy but I try to get info from other sources. Maybe every deductionist has to create their own style of deduction for their specific personality. If it`s that I don`t know maybe I have already created it and I don`t know or I don`t have the experience and capacity to do it.

I haven`t been able to improve in the field because I am too busy doing something else and not even remembering to deduce wich is becoming a very big problem because I am using a new training method, it`s deducing more people every day every week. I`m honestly lost because I don`t know what to do about this problem. I thought about writing it on my palm or something but I don`t know...

Sherlock Holmes started deducing at age 17. I myself, am 13 and I have already decided that I want to be a PI because I love solving mysteries and people.I will probably have enough skills in my twenties to deduce someone`s favourite fast food chain in the matter of seconds or something...

Taking these problems aside I am getting better at overall observation and I can deduce way harder things than 3 months ago when I started. I am very proud of this progress and the fact that I can entertain myself by sitting in a cafe next to a busy street. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Essay on Patrick Jane (spoilers)

 Introduction. Patrick Jane is the main protagonist in the 2000's American TV show "The Mentalist" portrayed by Simon Baker. Patrick Jane is the main   protagonist on the show, and with a surprisingly the least morals  on the team of protagonists. We'll get to these later. Patrick Jane works in the California Bureau of Investigation (CBI), but later works for the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI). Both as a consultant. Before that, he was a professional mentalist that faked psychic powers to get money out of people. Powers and abilities. Patrick Jane possesses a powerful mental prowess. He is a master of tactics and people, especially knowing them. His observational skills are absolutely exceptional. I myself, am a deductionist/mentalist, so I know about how this works. His observational skills are at the level of the legendary deductionist Sherlock Holmes. I'd even bother to say that Patrick Jane was a better Sherlock Holmes than the Benedict Cumberbatch inc
Post a Comment
Read more

Intuition & deduction

 Intuition. It's a thing that, if trained generally helps you with getting to know people. Also, looking through them. I'm currently working on the latter. Intuition is nothing that is like deduction, more like guessing. Very good guessing. In the show The Mentalist the protagonist, Patrick Jane uses his power of guesswork?  He uses what is called intuition and a fair bit of deduction. We'll get to that later. Now intuition is something that is quite trainable. I'm on the road of training it. Intuition is something that works subconsciously. You look at a person and it just happens. People often confuse intuition and deduction with presumption, and that is often thought of as "being racist". This slides into the social dilemma of deduction, that I'm probabli going to do an entry on.  How intuition works It basically works like this: You look at a person that is wearing very vibrant coloured clothes. A natural reaction in your brain is "This person mus
Post a Comment
Read more

Recent experiences

 A few days ago I saw a person that looked interesting to me, and because everyone on the internet was saying to me that I should practice, I started deducing and I didn`t get so much. I found out from attire that he must have been doing something sporty. He had his left hand in his pocket so he left his right, dominant hand to do something else. Lastly, he had some mud on his socks. That meant that he came there with a bike. NOT that it was an older sock because it rained that day. Also, I`ve been watching a lot of youtube on this topic. I also read an essay too from a young woman around my age. One of those youtube videos taught me how to observe a person. Starting from the shoes, going up to the knees then up to the jacket and it`s shoulders, back to the hands and lastly, the face. Then you simply run over the whole person again, from the data you gathered, create three or so theories and from those 1 greater picture of the person. I practice almost everyday but in passing deduction
Post a Comment
Read more