New practise method

I found Bruno Holmes training program on tumblr so I thought I should try this too. It's basically looking at people and observing through a few weeks and writing your observations down, so I did. All day I`ve been writing observations down on these papers:

(also if I`m doing the method wrong just tell me in the comments)

Here are my obervations:

Girl next to me got slimmer
She got a new backpack
Her friend is wearing lighter colored clothes while she is wearing black hoodie and trousers.
Got her pretty long nails cut like her friend
Shes trying to impress someone
Shes usually pretty messy but now she`s more organized

I actually suspected a crush for her friend that was sitting next to her but there wasn`t any nonverbal mirroring or anything that would sign affection so I crossed that out.

My friend`s shirt had creases, but it wasn`t folded
Not sure about this one, but less feminine women have flared trousers
Slim people are wearing hoodies
One classmate of mine has this compulive need to be loud and popular
People with social anxiety or shyness may relieve stress with nonverbal pacifiers
Girls (12-19) with friend have these sentimental looking armbands usually given as a gift (looking at this you can determine the size of the friendgroup)
Why do fat b*tches have the WORST attitude
Friend had sweaty hands
Shy people put their hands to their torso (nonverbal cue(they are protecting their vital organs by instinct))

I have deduced a crush in the past on body language. Dilated pupils etc.

I`m also going to do a video essay on my youtube channel but I`m not sure.

There is one weird thing that I think is for my best.

My friends have no clue I`m blogging or deducing wich gives me a bit of a headstart so they don`t try to hide anything from me. Also they think I`m stoopid so I kind of have this advantage in different situations where I flex my intelligence.

I noticed and deduced a lot of thing and people troughout the day, so I think I did a great job compared to my skill level.

happy deducing!

Comments

Essay on Patrick Jane (spoilers)

Introduction. Patrick Jane is the main protagonist in the 2000's American TV show "The Mentalist" portrayed by Simon Baker. Patrick Jane is the main protagonist on the show, and with a surprisingly the least morals on the team of protagonists. We'll get to these later. Patrick Jane works in the California Bureau of Investigation (CBI), but later works for the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI). Both as a consultant. Before that, he was a professional mentalist that faked psychic powers to get money out of people. Powers and abilities. Patrick Jane possesses a powerful mental prowess. He is a master of tactics and people, especially knowing them. His observational skills are absolutely exceptional. I myself, am a deductionist/mentalist, so I know about how this works. His observational skills are at the level of the legendary deductionist Sherlock Holmes. I'd even bother to say that Patrick Jane was a better Sherlock Holmes than the Benedict Cumberbatch inc

Intuition & deduction

Intuition. It's a thing that, if trained generally helps you with getting to know people. Also, looking through them. I'm currently working on the latter. Intuition is nothing that is like deduction, more like guessing. Very good guessing. In the show The Mentalist the protagonist, Patrick Jane uses his power of guesswork? He uses what is called intuition and a fair bit of deduction. We'll get to that later. Now intuition is something that is quite trainable. I'm on the road of training it. Intuition is something that works subconsciously. You look at a person and it just happens. People often confuse intuition and deduction with presumption, and that is often thought of as "being racist". This slides into the social dilemma of deduction, that I'm probabli going to do an entry on. How intuition works It basically works like this: You look at a person that is wearing very vibrant coloured clothes. A natural reaction in your brain is "This person mus

Recent experiences

A few days ago I saw a person that looked interesting to me, and because everyone on the internet was saying to me that I should practice, I started deducing and I didn`t get so much. I found out from attire that he must have been doing something sporty. He had his left hand in his pocket so he left his right, dominant hand to do something else. Lastly, he had some mud on his socks. That meant that he came there with a bike. NOT that it was an older sock because it rained that day. Also, I`ve been watching a lot of youtube on this topic. I also read an essay too from a young woman around my age. One of those youtube videos taught me how to observe a person. Starting from the shoes, going up to the knees then up to the jacket and it`s shoulders, back to the hands and lastly, the face. Then you simply run over the whole person again, from the data you gathered, create three or so theories and from those 1 greater picture of the person. I practice almost everyday but in passing deduction

Tales of an aspiring deductionist

Search This Blog