Refreshed mode of work

My mode of work now is much different from when I made the last entry regarding this topic. Back then I haven't formed any real perception of a process. I just collected all the crap I heard on the internet, that was in the back of my head and typed it out. Now I do everything differently.

I'm going to demonstrate on one of the deductions I had on a teacher, that I still remember.

Observations:

held coffee with right hand
had an engagement ring
not old
paints her hair
a little amnicure
no fur on trousers
no lines on forehead
cheap purse
a bit tired eyes
relaxed cheeks
Hands on hips
far away, spreaded legs
clothes not too warm
sporty shoes
no accesories

Deductions:

Right handed
likes coffee
around mid-30's
recently engaged (the ring seemed realatively new)
doesn't have any furry pets
Reads (eyes)
pretty confident in herself
feels old
grooms herself,but not that much
doesn't live in walking distance, came with a car
Didn't like accesories

First, like any deductionist, I ran her through. I look at her body, roll it through once or twice and stop at such points as the shoes, knees, hands, shoulders, shoulders, face and then I look at the body language. If I find anything interesting I deduce it right away. First as a hypothesis and when I don't find any opposing forces to dissaprove my deductions, I aproove of those deductions and declare them to myself as valid. When I gather my deductions, I usually want to fill out this cryteria.

primary hand
age
relationship(s)
study/work
pets
financial situation
popularity/friends
hobby
non-verbal baseline

I's still working on adding anything else to this list to deduce, but I'm okay with this. After searching for anything else, I'm done with the deduction. It could be kind of messy and it doesn't resemble any kind of sytem, but it's how I operate.

Happy deducing!

(told you)

Comments

Essay on Patrick Jane (spoilers)

Introduction. Patrick Jane is the main protagonist in the 2000's American TV show "The Mentalist" portrayed by Simon Baker. Patrick Jane is the main protagonist on the show, and with a surprisingly the least morals on the team of protagonists. We'll get to these later. Patrick Jane works in the California Bureau of Investigation (CBI), but later works for the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI). Both as a consultant. Before that, he was a professional mentalist that faked psychic powers to get money out of people. Powers and abilities. Patrick Jane possesses a powerful mental prowess. He is a master of tactics and people, especially knowing them. His observational skills are absolutely exceptional. I myself, am a deductionist/mentalist, so I know about how this works. His observational skills are at the level of the legendary deductionist Sherlock Holmes. I'd even bother to say that Patrick Jane was a better Sherlock Holmes than the Benedict Cumberbatch inc

Intuition & deduction

Intuition. It's a thing that, if trained generally helps you with getting to know people. Also, looking through them. I'm currently working on the latter. Intuition is nothing that is like deduction, more like guessing. Very good guessing. In the show The Mentalist the protagonist, Patrick Jane uses his power of guesswork? He uses what is called intuition and a fair bit of deduction. We'll get to that later. Now intuition is something that is quite trainable. I'm on the road of training it. Intuition is something that works subconsciously. You look at a person and it just happens. People often confuse intuition and deduction with presumption, and that is often thought of as "being racist". This slides into the social dilemma of deduction, that I'm probabli going to do an entry on. How intuition works It basically works like this: You look at a person that is wearing very vibrant coloured clothes. A natural reaction in your brain is "This person mus

Recent experiences

A few days ago I saw a person that looked interesting to me, and because everyone on the internet was saying to me that I should practice, I started deducing and I didn`t get so much. I found out from attire that he must have been doing something sporty. He had his left hand in his pocket so he left his right, dominant hand to do something else. Lastly, he had some mud on his socks. That meant that he came there with a bike. NOT that it was an older sock because it rained that day. Also, I`ve been watching a lot of youtube on this topic. I also read an essay too from a young woman around my age. One of those youtube videos taught me how to observe a person. Starting from the shoes, going up to the knees then up to the jacket and it`s shoulders, back to the hands and lastly, the face. Then you simply run over the whole person again, from the data you gathered, create three or so theories and from those 1 greater picture of the person. I practice almost everyday but in passing deduction

Tales of an aspiring deductionist

Search This Blog